I don't know if I could call the show better or worse, simply because it adhered so strictly to the book's plot. Very little was changed, with the exception of one or two welcome scenes that showed what her 1940s husband Frank Randall is doing in her absence. It gave us a hint about how the veil of time might be thinned near Craigh na Dun, the standing stones that send Claire back to 1743.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a92f/3a92fd4d6f82af9950b8689171be2316840665d7" alt="Image result for outlander show"
Seeing how faithful the show was left me with a choice--to continue watching the show in lieu of reading the books, or not at all. I never do this, but I have no time to waste on bad writing, and I was told that was the case with the later books. So I looked up the plot synopses of the later books. What little I could understand of that convoluted summary sounded like a soap opera at the height of ridiculous, where you can't understand the choices that characters make. I have no desire to see those stories in their own words. So I'm done with Outlander in all its forms. Gabaldon had something there, to be sure, but she didn't know how to handle it, or else is drawing inspiration from melodramatic forms I don't value, turning what should be solid fantasy into a trashy read. Being popular, unfortunately, doesn't make it smart writing. But in a new world where Trump is the President-elect, I shouldn't be surprised by that.
For better time-travelling romance, try Somewhere in Time, a Richard Matheson novel brilliantly adapted into the cult classic starring Christopher Reeve and Jane Seymour.
What is a very smart read is the one I'm working on now, The Shadow of the Wind. More on that soon.
What is a very smart read is the one I'm working on now, The Shadow of the Wind. More on that soon.
Somewhere in Time is great and I loved the movie too! Yeah, I watched most of the first season of Outlander but stopped because I completely lost interest. The scenery was beautiful though!
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely! It was shot beautifully,but unfortunately it's not enough to make good tv
Delete